You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Strategies for teaching evidence-based practice in nursing education: a thematic literature review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12909-018-1278-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
May-Elin T. Horntvedt, Anita Nordsteien, Torbjørg Fermann, Elisabeth Severinsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 31% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
Japan | 2 | 15% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 793 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 793 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 88 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 76 | 10% |
Lecturer | 49 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 4% |
Other | 142 | 18% |
Unknown | 368 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 217 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 47 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 2% |
Computer Science | 8 | 1% |
Other | 65 | 8% |
Unknown | 387 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,842,054
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#817
of 4,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,454
of 344,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#19
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.