↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
Published in
Trials, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0908-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisy Townsend, Nicola Mills, Jelena Savović, Jenny L. Donovan

Abstract

Recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often difficult. Clinician related factors have been implicated as important reasons for low rates of recruitment. Clinicians (doctors and other health professionals) can experience discomfort with some underlying principles of RCTs and experience difficulties in conveying them positively to potential trial participants. Recruiter training has been suggested to address identified problems but a synthesis of this research is lacking. The aim of our study was to systematically review the available evidence on training interventions for recruiters to randomised trials. Studies that evaluated training programmes for trial recruiters were included. Those that provided only general communication training not linked to RCT recruitment were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessment were completed by two reviewers independently, with a third author where necessary. Seventeen studies of 9615 potentially eligible titles and abstracts were included in the review: three randomised controlled studies, two non-randomised controlled studies, nine uncontrolled pre-test/post-test studies, two qualitative studies, and a post-training questionnaire survey. Most studies were of moderate or weak quality. Training programmes were mostly set within cancer trials, and usually consisted of workshops with a mix of health professionals over one or two consecutive days covering generic and trial specific issues. Recruiter training programmes were well received and some increased recruiters' self-confidence in communicating key RCT concepts to patients. There was, however, little evidence that this training increased actual recruitment rates or patient understanding, satisfaction, or levels of informed consent. There is a need to develop recruiter training programmes that can lead to improved recruitment and informed consent in randomised trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 17%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 14 18%