↓ Skip to main content

History and development of trauma registry: lessons from developed to developing countries

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
History and development of trauma registry: lessons from developed to developing countries
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, October 2006
DOI 10.1186/1749-7922-1-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedict C Nwomeh, Wendi Lowell, Renae Kable, Kathy Haley, Emmanuel A Ameh

Abstract

A trauma registry is an integral component of modern comprehensive trauma care systems. Trauma registries have not been established in most developing countries, and where they exist are often rudimentary and incomplete. This review describes the role of trauma registries in the care of the injured, and discusses how lessons from developed countries can be applied toward their design and implementation in developing countries. A detailed review of English-language articles on trauma registry was performed using MEDLINE and CINAHL. In addition, relevant articles from non-indexed journals were identified with Google Scholar. The history and development of trauma registries and their role in modern trauma care are discussed. Drawing from past and current experience, guidelines for the design and implementation of trauma registries are given, with emphasis on technical and logistic factors peculiar to developing countries. Improvement in trauma care depends on the establishment of functioning trauma care systems, of which a trauma registry is a crucial component. Hospitals and governments in developing countries should be encouraged to establish trauma registries using proven cost-effective strategies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Kenya 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 165 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 49 28%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 46 26%