↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for renal dysfunction after total hip joint replacement; a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk factors for renal dysfunction after total hip joint replacement; a retrospective cohort study
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0299-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Basim Kamil Hassan, Arne Sahlström, Ram Benny Christian Dessau

Abstract

Renal injury and dysfunction are serious complications after major surgery, which may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. The objective of our study was to identify the possible risk factors for renal dysfunction after total hip joint replacement surgery. A retrospective study was conducted among 599 consecutive primary hip joint replacements performed between January 2011 and December 2013. According to the RIFLE criteria, increased postoperative serum creatinine was considered indicative of postoperative renal injury. The Welch two-sample test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis. Eighty-one patients (13.8 %) had significant moderate or severe postoperative renal dysfunction in which 10 patients (1.7 %) acquired severe and permanent renal impairment. We identified advanced age, hypertension, general anesthesia, high ASA scores, low intra-operative systolic BP, and prophylactic dicloxacillin as significant risk factors. Low baseline systolic BP, low baseline diastolic blood pressure, and hip fracture diagnosis were independent risk factors for postoperative increase in serum creatinine. Smoking, diabetes mellitus, high BMI, gender, and duration of surgery were not identified as significant risk factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 26%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#13,214,454
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#392
of 1,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,029
of 274,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.