↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic techniques in deflagration and detonation studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Chemistry, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic techniques in deflagration and detonation studies
Published in
BMC Chemistry, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13065-015-0128-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

William G. Proud, David M. Williamson, John E. Field, Stephen M. Walley

Abstract

Advances in experimental, high-speed techniques can be used to explore the processes occurring within energetic materials. This review describes techniques used to study a wide range of processes: hot-spot formation, ignition thresholds, deflagration, sensitivity and finally the detonation process. As this is a wide field the focus will be on small-scale experiments and quantitative studies. It is important that such studies are linked to predictive models, which inform the experimental design process. The stimuli range includes, thermal ignition, drop-weight, Hopkinson Bar and Plate Impact studies. Studies made with inert simulants are also included as these are important in differentiating between reactive response and purely mechanical behaviour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 23%
Chemistry 5 23%
Physics and Astronomy 4 18%
Materials Science 3 14%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 18%