You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Indirect and direct routes to C-glycosylated flavones in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Cell Factories, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12934-018-0967-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherina Garcia Vanegas, Arésu Bondrup Larsen, Michael Eichenberger, David Fischer, Uffe Hasbro Mortensen, Michael Naesby |
| Abstract |
Upon publication of this article [1], it was brought to our attention that revised Fig. 1 supplied by the author during proof correction was unfortunately not presented in the original version of the article. The revised Fig. 1 is given in this erratum. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,173
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#1,380
of 1,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,217
of 330,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.