↓ Skip to main content

Effect of end-stage renal disease on long-term survival after a first-ever mechanical ventilation: a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of end-stage renal disease on long-term survival after a first-ever mechanical ventilation: a population-based study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-1071-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chin-Ming Chen, Chih-Cheng Lai, Kuo-Chen Cheng, Shih-Feng Weng, Wei-Lun Liu, Hsiu-Nien Shen

Abstract

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD(Pos)) usually have multiple comorbidities and are predisposed to acute organ failure and in-hospital mortality. We assessed the effect of ESRD on the poorly understood long-term mortality risk after a first-ever mechanical ventilation (1-MV) for acute respiratory failure. The data source was Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) Research Database. All patients given a 1-MV between 1999 and 2008 from one million randomly selected NHI beneficiaries were identified (n = 38,659). Patients with or without ESRD (ESRD(Neg)) after a 1-MV between 1999 and 2008 were retrospectively compared and followed from the index admission date to death or the end of 2011. ESRD(Pos) patients (n = 1185; mean age: 65.9 years; men: 51.5 %) were individually matched to ESRD(Neg) patients (ratio: 1:8) using a propensity score method. The primary outcome was death after a 1-MV. The effect of ESRD on the risk of death after MV was assessed. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess how ESRD affected the mortality risk after a 1-MV. The baseline characteristics of the two cohorts were balanced, but the incidence of mortality was higher in ESRD(Pos) patients than in ESRD(Neg) patients (342.30 versus 179.67 per 1000 person-years; P <0.001; covariate-adjusted hazard ratio: 1.43; 95 % confidence interval: 1.31-1.51). For patients who survived until discharge, ESRD was not associated with long-term (>4 years) mortality. ESRD increased the mortality risk after a 1-MV, but long-term survival seemed similar.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 10 31%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,535,152
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,131
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,731
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#259
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.