You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-475 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valesca P Retèl, Lisette van der Molen, Frans JM Hilgers, Coen RN Rasch, Annemiek AAMHJ L'Ortye, Lotte MG Steuten, Wim H van Harten |
| Abstract |
Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) has become an indispensable organ, but not always function preserving treatment modality for advanced head and neck cancer. To prevent/limit the functional side effects of CCRT, special exercise programs are increasingly explored. This study presents cost-effectiveness analyses of a preventive (swallowing) exercise program (PREP) compared to usual care (UC) from a health care perspective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 23% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2011.
All research outputs
#17,651,093
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,955
of 8,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,355
of 141,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#63
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.