You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Echocardiography for adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-1042-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ghislaine Douflé, Andrew Roscoe, Filio Billia, Eddy Fan |
| Abstract |
Venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is increasingly being used in recent years in the adult population. Owing to the underlying disease precipitating severe respiratory or cardiac failure, echocardiography plays an important role in the management of these patients. Nevertheless, there are currently no guidelines on the use of echocardiography in the setting of ECMO support. This review describes the current state of application of echocardiography for patients supported with both VA and VV ECMO. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 19% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 27% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 16% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 23% |
| Unknown | 37 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 64% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 47 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#963,368
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#746
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,047
of 395,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#45
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.