↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of frozen and RNALater solid tissue storage methods for use in RNA expression microarrays

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of frozen and RNALater solid tissue storage methods for use in RNA expression microarrays
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-5-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

George L Mutter, David Zahrieh, Chunmei Liu, Donna Neuberg, David Finkelstein, Heather E Baker, Janet A Warrington

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 227 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 28%
Researcher 56 23%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 22 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 12%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 29 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#10,592,036
of 13,304,005 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,030
of 7,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,359
of 268,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,304,005 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.