↓ Skip to main content

Parasite clearance after malaria therapy: staying a step ahead of drug resistance

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parasite clearance after malaria therapy: staying a step ahead of drug resistance
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0486-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harin A. Karunajeewa

Abstract

The discovery and development of the artemisinin class of antimalarial drugs is one of the great recent success stories of global health. However, after at least two decades of successful use, resistance has finally emerged and appears to be spreading rapidly throughout South-East Asia in spite of our best efforts at containment. If this were also to occur in Africa, it would have disastrous implications for the continent subject to the world's greatest burden of Plasmodium falciparum. The earliest indications of incipient artemisinin resistance may be a slowing of the rate at which parasites are cleared from the blood following treatment. The Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network have analysed data from 29,493 patients from 84 clinical trials in order to define the nature and determinants of early parasite clearance following artemisinin-based treatment in African populations. In doing so, they lay the foundation for systems intended to enable the earliest possible detection of emerging artemisinin resistance in Africa.Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/212.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Vietnam 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Master 10 21%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,010,574
of 24,088,270 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,764
of 3,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,582
of 279,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#77
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,088,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.