↓ Skip to main content

Hyperpolarized 13C and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy identify pyruvate dehydrogenase as a therapeutic target in obesity cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperpolarized 13C and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy identify pyruvate dehydrogenase as a therapeutic target in obesity cardiomyopathy
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-17-s1-o16
Authors

Andrew J Lewis, Michael S Dodd, Joevin Sourdon, Kieran Clarke, Stefan Neubauer, Damian J Tyler, Oliver Rider

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Researcher 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,947,998
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,197
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,739
of 362,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#34
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.