↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of confidence in anatomy knowledge for work as a junior doctor: a national survey of Australian medical students

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of confidence in anatomy knowledge for work as a junior doctor: a national survey of Australian medical students
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12909-018-1280-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

John E. Farey, David T. Bui, David Townsend, Premala Sureshkumar, Sandra Carr, Chris Roberts

Abstract

Major changes to the teaching of anatomy associated with the integration of basic and clinical sciences in modern medical curricula have coincided with students reporting concern over achievement of learning outcomes in anatomy. Little guidance exists for medical educators designing anatomy courses that account for factors that positively influence medical student confidence in their own anatomy knowledge. We sought to determine what factors are associated with medical students' self-reported confidence in their anatomy knowledge in preparation for clinical practice. Cross-sectional national survey of Australian medical students distributed using social media. We performed univariate and multivariable ordinal regression to determine the factors in anatomy learning and teaching that influence medical student self-reported confidence to have sufficient anatomy knowledge by the time of graduation, for practice as a junior doctor. Of 1309 surveyed, 1101 (84%) responded, representing 6.5% of the Australian medical student population. Mean age was 23.9 years (SD 4.8 years), a majority were female (644, 58.5%), and students in all years of both undergraduate (52%, 575) and graduate entry courses (48%, 529) were represented. Items associated with increased self-reported confidence in anatomy knowledge included adequate assessment of anatomy (Odds Ratio 2.17 [95% CI 1.69-2.81]), integration of anatomy with other basic sciences (OR 1.97 [1.52-2.56]) and clinical teaching (OR 1.90 [1.46-2.48]), male gender (OR 1.89 [1.48-2.42]), anatomy education prior to medical school (OR 1.46 [1.14-1.87]) and exposure to dissection (OR 1.39 [1.08-1.78]). Medical students in their clinical years reported lower confidence in their anatomy knowledge (OR 0.6 [0.47-0.77], p < 0.0001). Age and career intention were not significant predictors of confidence. Medical educators can enhance student confidence in their own anatomy knowledge by developing curricula that vertically integrating anatomy learning and teaching, integrate anatomy teaching with other basic sciences, and providing consistent assessment through both the pre-clinical and clinical stages of medical training. Anatomy education should also incorporate dissection as a teaching method, and students could benefit from completion of anatomy education prior to medical school. Consideration should also be given to further investigate the confidence of female students in their anatomy knowledge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Lecturer 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 41 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 39%
Psychology 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 43 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,516,855
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,348
of 3,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,227
of 329,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#36
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.