↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic value of extravascular lung water assessed with lung ultrasound score by chest sonography in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic value of extravascular lung water assessed with lung ultrasound score by chest sonography in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12890-015-0091-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhen Zhao, Li Jiang, Xiuming Xi, Qi Jiang, Bo Zhu, Meiping Wang, Jin Xing, Dan Zhang

Abstract

The prognostic value of extravascular lung water indices (EVLWI) has been widely investigated, which is determined by lung ultrasound B-lines. However, the clinical value of lung ultrasound B-lines for determining prognosis/intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been rarely reported. Twenty-one ARDS patients admitted to the ICU of Fu Xing Hospital underwent both lung ultrasonography and pulse index continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring on the first, second, and third days after diagnosis. The correlation between lung ultrasound score (LUS) and EVLWI measured by the PiCCO system was investigated. The prognostic clinical value of lung ultrasonography in ARDS patients was explored. Chest ultrasound was performed using the 12 regions method. The comprehensive score of lung ultrasound was determined according to the level of lung aeration. With ICU mortality as the end point, 21 patients were divided into a survivor group (8 patients, 39.1 %) and a non-survivor group (13 patients, 61.9 %). Significant positive linear correlations were found between LUS and EVLWI, including predicted body weight (r (2) = 0.906), sequential organ failure assessment score (r (2) = 0.815), lung injury score (r (2) = 0.361), and PaO2/FiO2 (r (2) = 0.472). Significantly different LUSs were found between the non-survivor and survivor groups (F = 77.64, P <0.01) by repeated-measures analysis of variance. There were no significant differences between the two groups on different days. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of LUS and EVLW measured by PiCCO were 0.846 (P < 0.01) and 0.918 (P < 0.01), respectively. The cut-off of LUS for prognosis prediction was 16.5. Lung ultrasonography is a non-invasive, economic, simple, user-friendly, and radiation-free bedside method for predicting the prognosis of ARDS patients. Early measurement of LUS is a better prognostic indicator in patients with ARDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 22 13%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Master 12 7%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 46 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,254,036
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#230
of 1,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,896
of 266,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.