You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The liver in sepsis: shedding light on the cellular basis of hepatocyte dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12731 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John C Marshall |
| Abstract |
Liver dysfunction is believed to contribute to the metabolic derangements of critical illness. The cellular basis of liver dysfunction is poorly understood and its consequences largely unknown. Recent work by Gonnert and colleagues sheds additional light. Using two imaging techniques to track the clearance of biotransformed dyes by the liver in a rat model of intra-abdominal infection, the authors show that the predominant defect in sepsis lies in the excretion of biotransformed molecules from the hepatocyte into the bile canaliculi. Their work both points to a new aspect of hepatic dysfunction through focus on a role in the metabolic derangements of sepsis and suggests a possible strategy to diagnose and monitor this process in critically ill patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 77% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,211
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,094
of 209,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#76
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.