↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of iota-carrageenan nasal spray versus placebo in early treatment of the common cold in adults: the ICICC trial

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of iota-carrageenan nasal spray versus placebo in early treatment of the common cold in adults: the ICICC trial
Published in
Respiratory Research, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12931-015-0281-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Eccles, B. Winther, S.L. Johnston, P. Robinson, M. Trampisch, S. Koelsch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 36 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Chemistry 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 42 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,240,324
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#93
of 3,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,735
of 293,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.