↓ Skip to main content

Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society…

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12933-015-0296-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Viveca Gyberg, Dirk De Bacquer, Guy De Backer, Catriona Jennings, Kornelia Kotseva, Linda Mellbin, Oliver Schnell, Jaakko Tuomilehto, David Wood, Lars Rydén, Philippe Amouyel, Jan Bruthans, Almudena Castro Conde, Renata Cifkova, Jaap W. Deckers, Johan De Sutter, Mirza Dilic, Maryna Dolzhenko, Andrejs Erglis, Zlatko Fras, Dan Gaita, Nina Gotcheva, John Goudevenos, Peter Heuschmann, Aleksandras Laucevicius, Seppo Lehto, Dragan Lovic, Davor Miličić, David Moore, Evagoras Nicolaides, Raphael Oganov, Andrzej Pająk, Nana Pogosova, Zeljko Reiner, Martin Stagmo, Stefan Störk, Lale Tokgözoğlu, Dusko Vulic, On behalf of the EUROASPIRE Investigators

Abstract

In order to influence every day clinical practice professional organisations issue management guidelines. Cross-sectional surveys are used to evaluate the implementation of such guidelines. The present survey investigated screening for glucose perturbations in people with coronary artery disease and compared patients with known and newly detected type 2 diabetes with those without diabetes in terms of their life-style and pharmacological risk factor management in relation to contemporary European guidelines. A total of 6187 patients (18-80 years) with coronary artery disease and known glycaemic status based on a self reported history of diabetes (previously known diabetes) or the results of an oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c (no diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes) were investigated in EUROASPIRE IV including patients in 24 European countries 2012-2013. The patients were interviewed and investigated in order to enable a comparison between their actual risk factor control with that recommended in current European management guidelines and the outcome in previously conducted surveys. A total of 2846 (46 %) patients had no diabetes, 1158 (19 %) newly diagnosed diabetes and 2183 (35 %) previously known diabetes. The combined use of all four cardioprotective drugs in these groups was 53, 55 and 60 %, respectively. A blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved in 68, 61, 54 % and a LDL-cholesterol target of <1.8 mmol/L in 16, 18 and 28 %. Patients with newly diagnosed and previously known diabetes reached an HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) in 95 and 53 % and 11 % of those with previously known diabetes had an HbA1c >9.0 % (>75 mmol/mol). Of the patients with diabetes 69 % reported on low physical activity. The proportion of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes was low (≈40 %) and only 27 % of those with diabetes had attended diabetes schools. Compared with data from previous surveys the use of cardioprotective drugs had increased and more patients were achieving the risk factor treatment targets. Despite advances in patient management there is further potential to improve both the detection and management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 202 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 44 21%
Unknown 53 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,724,101
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#785
of 1,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,239
of 275,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.