↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetics and the overhealing wound: the role of DNA methylation in fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenetics and the overhealing wound: the role of DNA methylation in fibrosis
Published in
Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13069-015-0035-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roisin Neary, Chris J. Watson, John A. Baugh

Abstract

Fibrosis is a progressive and potentially fatal process that can occur in numerous organ systems. Characterised by the excessive deposition of extracellular matrix proteins such as collagens and fibronectin, fibrosis affects normal tissue architecture and impedes organ function. Although a considerable amount of research has focused on the mechanisms underlying disease pathogenesis, current therapeutic options do not directly target the pro-fibrotic process. As a result, there is a clear unmet clinical need to develop new agents. Novel findings implicate a role for epigenetic modifications contributing to the progression of fibrosis by alteration of gene expression profiles. This review will focus on DNA methylation; its association with fibroblast differentiation and activation and the consequent buildup of fibrotic scar tissue. The potential use of therapies that modulate this epigenetic pathway for the treatment of fibrosis in several organ systems is also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Master 23 17%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 14%
Chemistry 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,107,169
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#29
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,013
of 287,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them