↓ Skip to main content

Effect-site concentration of propofol required for LMA-Supreme™ insertion with and without remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect-site concentration of propofol required for LMA-Supreme™ insertion with and without remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12871-015-0115-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matilde Zaballos, Emilia Bastida, Salomé Agustí, Maite Portas, Consuelo Jiménez, Maite López-Gil

Abstract

A new supraglottic device, the LMA-Supreme™, has recently become available for clinical use. Information on anaesthetic and co-adjuvant requirements for insertion of the LMA-Supreme™ is limited. The present study aimed to evaluate the optimal effect-site concentration of propofol in 50 % (EC50) of adults necessary for successful insertion of the LMA-Supreme™ and to examine remifentanil's effect on propofol requirements. Fifty-eight elective patients (aged 18-60 years; ASA (American Society Anaesthesiologists) physical status classification I and II) scheduled for day surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups: propofol with saline or propofol with remifentanil. Anaesthesia was induced by target-controlled infusion according to predetermined effect-site concentrations of propofol and remifentanil (5 ng.mL(-1)). The EC50 was calculated using Dixon's up-and-down method. Ten minutes following drug administration, LMA-Supreme™ insertion was attempted without the use of muscle relaxant drugs. In the propofol + saline group, the EC50 of propofol required for LMA-Supreme™ insertion was 6.32 ± 0.67 μg.mL(-1) (95 % CI, 5.69-6.94 μg.mL(-1)). With the addition of remifentanil at an effect-site concentration of 5 ng.mL(-1), the EC50 of propofol required for LMA-Supreme™ insertion was 2.50 ± 0.80 μg.mL(-1) (95 % CI, 1.82-3.17 μg.mL(-1); p < 0.0001). The propofol requirement for smooth insertion of the LMA-Supreme™ was 60 % less when remifentanil (5 ng.mL(-1)) was co-administered. Identified as NCT01974648 at www.clinicaltrials.gov .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Lecturer 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 52%