You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What do emergency medicine and burns specialists from resource constrained settings expect from mHealth-based diagnostic support? A qualitative study examining the case of acute burn care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-018-0647-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iona Crumley, Lisa Blom, Lucie Laflamme, Helle Mölsted Alvesson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,635
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,719
of 344,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.