↓ Skip to main content

Time-series maps of aboveground carbon stocks in the forests of central Sumatra

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time-series maps of aboveground carbon stocks in the forests of central Sumatra
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13021-015-0034-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajesh Bahadur Thapa, Takeshi Motohka, Manabu Watanabe, Masanobu Shimada

Abstract

Efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in tropical Asia require accurate high-resolution mapping of forest carbon stocks and predictions of their likely future variation. Here we combine radar and LiDAR with field measurements to create a high-resolution aboveground forest carbon stock (AFCS) map and use spatial modeling to present probable future AFCS changes for the Riau province of central Sumatra. Our map provides spatially explicit estimates of the AFCS with an accuracy of ±23.5 Mg C ha(-1). According to this map, the natural forests in the province currently store 265 million Mg C, with a density of 72 Mg C ha(-1), as aboveground biomass. Using a spatially explicit modeling technique we derived time-series AFCS maps up to the year 2030 under three forest policy scenarios: business as usual, conservation, and concession. The spatial patterns of AFCS and their trends under different scenarios vary on a local scale, and some areas are highlighted that are at eminent risk of carbon emission. Based on the business as usual scenario, the current AFCS could decrease by 75 %, which may lead to the release of 747 million Mg CO2. The other two scenarios, conservation and concession, suggest the risk reductions by 11 and 59 %, respectively. The time-series AFCS maps provide spatially explicit scenarios of changes in AFCS. These data may aid in planning Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation in developing countries projects in the study area, and stimulate the development of AFCS maps for other regions of tropical Asia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Computer Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,774,664
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#190
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,334
of 272,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.