You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13742-015-0086-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexei J. Drummond, Richard D. Newcomb, Thomas R. Buckley, Dong Xie, Andrew Dopheide, Benjamin CM Potter, Joseph Heled, Howard A. Ross, Leah Tooman, Stefanie Grosser, Duckchul Park, Nicholas J. Demetras, Mark I. Stevens, James C. Russell, Sandra H. Anderson, Anna Carter, Nicola Nelson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 6 | 18% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
| Scientists | 11 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 384 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 23% |
| Researcher | 85 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 42 | 11% |
| Unknown | 70 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 163 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 67 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 59 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Unknown | 85 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,120,000
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#174
of 1,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,160
of 292,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.