↓ Skip to main content

Swedish student nurses’ perception of peer learning as an educational model during clinical practice in a hospital setting—an evaluation study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nursing, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Swedish student nurses’ perception of peer learning as an educational model during clinical practice in a hospital setting—an evaluation study
Published in
BMC Nursing, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12912-015-0098-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Stenberg, Elisabeth Carlson

Abstract

Peer learning, a collaborative learning model has no tradition in clinical education for undergraduate student nurses in Sweden, and little is reported of the student experience. An increasing number of students have led to a pressing need for preceptors and clinical placements thus, highlighting the need for a supportive educational model. The objectives for the current study were to explore how student nurses' evaluated peer learning as an educational model during clinical practice in a hospital setting, and to compare perceptions among student nurses from year one and three. A questionnaire developed for the purpose of this study was developed and responded to by 62 (year one) and 73 (year three) student nurses. Data were collected between 2011 and 2013. The questionnaire contained six open- ended and eight closed questions on a four point Likert-scale. Written responses were analysed by content analysis and the closed questions by using descriptive statistics. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to examine differences in relation to students from year one and three. The peer learning experience was evaluated in a positive way. Statistical significance differences were shown for two out of eight closed questions. The peer learning activities were evaluated as supportive and relevant for learning. Three categories emerged from the content analysis: "a feeling of safety", "a sense of competition" and "the learning experience". A feeling of safety seems to be connected to students' perception of increased learning and independence. However, the sense of negative competition needs to be addressed when students are prepared for the teaching and learning activities in the peer learning model. Finally, what needs to be further investigated is what challenges and opportunities the peer learning model presents to preceptors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Lecturer 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 14%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 48 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#836
of 958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,175
of 287,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.