↓ Skip to main content

Review of prostate cancer research in Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of prostate cancer research in Nigeria
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1750-9378-6-s2-s8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Titilola O Akinremi, Chidiebere N Ogo, Ayodeji O Olutunde

Abstract

Prostate cancer (CaP) disparities in the black man calls for concerted research efforts. This review explores the trend and focus of CaP research activities in Nigeria, one of the ancestral nations for black men. It seeks to locate the place of the Nigerian research environment in the global progress on CaP disparities. Literature was reviewed mainly through a Pubmed search with the terms "prostate cancer"and "Nigeria", as well as from internet and hard copies of journal pages.Findings: One of the earliest publications about CaP in Nigeria was in 1973 from the nation's 1st tertiary hospital in Ibadan, reporting low incidence, followed by a lull of nearly one decade. In 1980, the incidence rate of CaP was reported as almost similar for black men in Ibadan and Washington and from then on, research work from surgeons and pathologists, from the south to the north, east to west, continued to report increasing prevalence of CaP. Apart from epidemiology, other areas of research include KAP (knowledge attitude and practice) studies (poor education of caregivers and population), histopathology (mostly adenocarcinoma), diagnosis (digital rectal examination [DRE], prostate specific antigen [PSA], ultrasound), clinical features (late presentation and high mortality), and prevention (lifestyle, education and screening). As of today there is a gaping dearth of molecular and genetic studies. Conclusion: The global focus on CaP disparities in black men calls for more efforts from Africa, in all areas of research, along with international collaborations for capacity building.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 3 2%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 24 15%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Lecturer 10 6%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,150,151
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#465
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,160
of 130,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.