↓ Skip to main content

Statin effects on atherosclerotic plaques: regression or healing?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statin effects on atherosclerotic plaques: regression or healing?
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0499-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcio Sommer Bittencourt, Rodrigo Julio Cerci

Abstract

Despite the well-documented improved survival of coronary heart disease with the use of statins, their effects on atherosclerotic plaques are not yet fully understood. While some studies suggest statins may reduce plaque volume, the reduction is small even with the use of high-dose statins. Due to this small change in plaque volume, other effects of statin therapy on plaques have been proposed. A large meta-analysis by Banach et al. explored statin effects on plaque composition detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We discuss the mechanisms of plaque composition modification demonstrated in their study and its implications on atherosclerotic plaque stabilization.ᅟPlease see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/229 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 20%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,773,686
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,245
of 4,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,530
of 290,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#42
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.