↓ Skip to main content

What happens when you tell someone you self-injure? The effects of disclosing NSSI to adults and peers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What happens when you tell someone you self-injure? The effects of disclosing NSSI to adults and peers
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2383-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Penelope Hasking, Clare S. Rees, Graham Martin, Jessie Quigley

Abstract

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is associated with significant adverse consequences, including increased risk of suicide, and is a growing public health concern. Consequently, facilitating help-seeking in youth who self-injure is an important goal. Although young people who disclose their NSSI typically confide in peers and family, it is unclear how this disclosure and related variables (e.g. support from family and friends, coping behaviours, reasons for living) affect help-seeking over time. The aim of this study was to advance understanding of the impact of disclosure of NSSI by young people and to investigate these effects over time. A sample of 2637 adolescents completed self-report questionnaires at three time points, one year apart. Of the sample, 526 reported a history of NSSI and 308 of those who self-injured had disclosed their behaviour to someone else, most commonly friends and parents. Overall, we observed that disclosure of NSSI to parents facilitates informal help-seeking, improves coping and reduces suicidality, but that disclosure to peers might reduce perceived social support and encourage NSSI in others. We discuss these findings in light of their clinical and research implications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 60 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 64 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#578,092
of 25,158,951 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#550
of 16,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,257
of 285,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,158,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.