You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of a 'toolkit' to identify medical students at risk of failure to thrive on the course: an exploratory retrospective case study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-95 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Janet Yates |
Abstract |
An earlier study at Nottingham suggested that 10-15% of the medical student intake was likely to fail completely or have substantial problems on the course. This is a problem for the students, the Faculty, and society as a whole. If struggling students could be identified early in the course and additional pastoral resources offered, some of this wastage might be avoided. An exploratory case study was conducted to determine whether there were common indicators in the early years, over and above academic failure, that might aid the identification of students potentially at risk. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 111 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
Professor | 14 | 12% |
Researcher | 12 | 10% |
Lecturer | 10 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
Other | 32 | 28% |
Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 46% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,357,126
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,705
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,656
of 238,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.