↓ Skip to main content

Assessing clinicopathological correlation in chronic traumatic encephalopathy: rationale and methods for the UNITE study

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing clinicopathological correlation in chronic traumatic encephalopathy: rationale and methods for the UNITE study
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13195-015-0148-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse Mez, Todd M. Solomon, Daniel H. Daneshvar, Lauren Murphy, Patrick T. Kiernan, Philip H. Montenigro, Joshua Kriegel, Bobak Abdolmohammadi, Brian Fry, Katharine J. Babcock, Jason W. Adams, Alexandra P. Bourlas, Zachary Papadopoulos, Lisa McHale, Brent M. Ardaugh, Brett R. Martin, Diane Dixon, Christopher J. Nowinski, Christine Chaisson, Victor E. Alvarez, Yorghos Tripodis, Thor D. Stein, Lee E. Goldstein, Douglas I. Katz, Neil W. Kowall, Robert C. Cantu, Robert A. Stern, Ann C. McKee

Abstract

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a progressive neurodegeneration associated with repetitive head impacts. Understanding Neurologic Injury and Traumatic Encephalopathy (UNITE) is a U01 project recently funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. The goal of the UNITE project is to examine the neuropathology and clinical presentation of brain donors designated as "at risk" for the development of CTE based on prior athletic or military exposure. Here, we present the rationale and methodology for UNITE. Over the course of 4 years, we will analyze the brains and spinal cords of 300 deceased subjects who had a history of repetitive head impacts sustained during participation in contact sports at the professional or collegiate level or during military service. Clinical data are collected through medical record review and retrospective structured and unstructured family interviews conducted by a behavioral neurologist or neuropsychologist. Blinded to the clinical data, a neuropathologist conducts a comprehensive assessment for neurodegenerative disease, including CTE, using published criteria. At a clinicopathological conference, a panel of physicians and neuropsychologists, blinded to the neuropathological data, reaches a clinical consensus diagnosis using published criteria, including proposed clinical research criteria for CTE. We will investigate the validity of these clinical criteria and sources of error by using recently validated neuropathological criteria as a gold standard for CTE diagnosis. We also will use statistical modeling to identify diagnostic features that best predict CTE pathology. The UNITE study is a novel and methodologically rigorous means of assessing clinicopathological correlation in CTE. Our findings will be critical for developing future iterations of CTE clinical diagnostic criteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Unknown 161 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 22%
Neuroscience 19 12%
Psychology 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 52 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,427,876
of 23,939,410 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#199
of 1,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,232
of 282,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,939,410 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.