↓ Skip to main content

A new high-throughput screening-compatible gap junctional intercellular communication assay

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new high-throughput screening-compatible gap junctional intercellular communication assay
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12896-015-0211-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ju Yeon Lee, Eun Ju Choi, Jinu Lee

Abstract

Gap junctions (GJs) are intercellular channels through which molecules smaller than 1 kDa can diffuse, and they have been suggested as drug targets. To develop chemical drugs acting on this target, a high-throughput screening (HTS) system for GJ modulators is necessary. We designed a new, high-throughput GJ intercellular communication (GJIC) assay. This assay system consisted of donor and acceptor cells from LN215 glioma cells that expressed SLC26A4 and yellow fluorescent protein-H148Q/I152L (YFP(QL)), respectively. The fluorescence of LN215-YFP(QL) acceptor cells, when cultured alone, was not quenched by iodide. However when donor and acceptor cells, or LN215-YFP(QL) and LN215-I(-) cells, were mixed and plated, they formed GJs. When iodide was added, it was transported into donor cells by SLC26A4, diffused through the GJs to acceptor cells, and quenched the YFP(QL) fluorescence. The quenching rate was optimal at a 2:1 mixture of donor and acceptor cells. The assay quality parameter, Z' factor, was calculated from data collected with vehicle and carbenoxolone. For each assay, the Z' factor increased with time. The Z' factor of a 10-s assay was 0.72 indicating that the assay quality was high enough for use in HTS. This assay system also worked well in HOS osteosarcoma cells with a Z' factor at 10 s of 0.70. We developed a new HTS system for GJ modulators. The system had a high assay quality with a Z' factor ≥ 0.70, was rapid and required only 10 s per well, was inexpensive in requiring no additional reagents, and was predicted to have a low rate of false-positive hits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
China 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Engineering 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,239,950
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#626
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,038
of 277,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.