↓ Skip to main content

Combined clinical and genomic signatures for the prognosis of early stage non-small cell lung cancer based on gene copy number alterations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined clinical and genomic signatures for the prognosis of early stage non-small cell lung cancer based on gene copy number alterations
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1935-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ander Aramburu, Isabel Zudaire, María J. Pajares, Jackeline Agorreta, Alberto Orta, María D. Lozano, Alfonso Gúrpide, Javier Gómez-Román, Jose A. Martinez-Climent, Jacek Jassem, Marcin Skrzypski, Milind Suraokar, Carmen Behrens, Ignacio I. Wistuba, Ruben Pio, Angel Rubio, Luis M. Montuenga

Abstract

The development of a more refined prognostic methodology for early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an unmet clinical need. An accurate prognostic tool might help to select patients at early stages for adjuvant therapies. A new integrated bioinformatics searching strategy, that combines gene copy number alterations and expression, together with clinical parameters was applied to derive two prognostic genomic signatures. The proposed methodology combines data from patients with and without clinical data with a priori information on the ability of a gene to be a prognostic marker. Two initial candidate sets of 513 and 150 genes for lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), respectively, were generated by identifying genes which have both: a) significant correlation between copy number and gene expression, and b) significant prognostic value at the gene expression level in external databases. From these candidates, two panels of 7 (ADC) and 5 (SCC) genes were further identified via semi-supervised learning. These panels, together with clinical data (stage, age and sex), were used to construct the ADC and SCC hazard scores combining clinical and genomic data. The signatures were validated in two independent datasets (n = 73 for ADC, n = 97 for SCC), confirming that the prognostic value of both clinical-genomic models is robust, statistically significant (P = 0.008 for ADC and P = 0.019 for SCC) and outperforms both the clinical models (P = 0.060 for ADC and P = 0.121 for SCC) and the genomic models applied separately (P = 0.350 for ADC and P = 0.269 for SCC). The present work provides a methodology to generate a robust signature using copy number data that can be potentially used to any cancer. Using it, we found new prognostic scores based on tumor DNA that, jointly with clinical information, are able to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with early-stage ADC and SCC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,061,548
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,617
of 10,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,707
of 279,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#46
of 360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,742 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.