↓ Skip to main content

The importance of values in evidence-based medicine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,119)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
253 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of values in evidence-based medicine
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12910-015-0063-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael P. Kelly, Iona Heath, Jeremy Howick, Trisha Greenhalgh

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has always required integration of patient values with 'best' clinical evidence. It is widely recognized that scientific practices and discoveries, including those of EBM, are value-laden. But to date, the science of EBM has focused primarily on methods for reducing bias in the evidence, while the role of values in the different aspects of the EBM process has been almost completely ignored. In this paper, we address this gap by demonstrating how a consideration of values can enhance every aspect of EBM, including: prioritizing which tests and treatments to investigate, selecting research designs and methods, assessing effectiveness and efficiency, supporting patient choice and taking account of the limited time and resources available to busy clinicians. Since values are integral to the practice of EBM, it follows that the highest standards of EBM require values to be made explicit, systematically explored, and integrated into decision making. Through 'values based' approaches, EBM's connection to the humanitarian principles upon which it was founded will be strengthened.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 253 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 367 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 51 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 12%
Researcher 41 11%
Other 27 7%
Other 78 21%
Unknown 79 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 10%
Social Sciences 27 7%
Psychology 15 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 3%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 100 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#163,764
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#5
of 1,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,116
of 292,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.