You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Myocardial tissue tagging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-11-55 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Monda L Shehata, Susan Cheng, Nael F Osman, David A Bluemke, João AC Lima |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
United States | 4 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 186 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 24% |
Researcher | 35 | 17% |
Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
Other | 21 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
Other | 40 | 20% |
Unknown | 20 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 50% |
Engineering | 39 | 19% |
Computer Science | 9 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
Other | 11 | 5% |
Unknown | 33 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,102
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,121
of 178,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.