Title |
Impact of vitamin D on pathological complete response and survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-018-4686-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marie Viala, Akiko Chiba, Simon Thezenas, Laure Delmond, Pierre-Jean Lamy, Sarah L. Mott, Mary C. Schroeder, Alexandra Thomas, William Jacot |
Abstract |
There has been interest in the potential benefit of vitamin D (VD) to improve breast cancer outcomes. Pre-clinical studies suggest VD enhances chemotherapy-induced cell death. Vitamin D deficiency was associated with not attaining a pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for operable breast cancer. We report the impact of VD on pCR and survival in an expanded cohort. Patients from Iowa and Montpellier registries who had serum VD level measured before or during NAC were included. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as < 20 ng/mL. Pathological complete response was defined as no residual invasive disease in the breast and lymph nodes. Survival was defined from the date of diagnosis to the date of relapse (PFS) or date of death (OS). The study included 327 women. Vitamin D deficiency was associated with the odds of not attaining pCR (p = 0.04). Fifty-four patients relapsed and 52 patients died. In multivariate analysis, stage III disease, triple-negative (TN) subtype and the inability to achieve pCR were independently associated with inferior survival. Vitamin D deficiency was not significantly associated with survival in the overall sample; however a trend was seen in the TN (5-years PFS 60.4% vs. 72.3%, p = 0.3), and in the hormone receptor positive /human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) subgroups (5-years PFS 89% vs 78%, p = 0.056). Vitamin D deficiency is associated with the inability to reach pCR in breast cancer patients undergoing NAC. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Romania | 1 | 25% |
France | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 24% |
Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 18 | 40% |