↓ Skip to main content

Long-term follow-up of non-operated patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones: a retrospective study evaluating the role of Hepatobiliary scanning

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term follow-up of non-operated patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones: a retrospective study evaluating the role of Hepatobiliary scanning
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12876-015-0368-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keun Soo Ahn, Ho-Seong Han, Jai Young Cho, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Chulhan Kim, Won Woo Lee

Abstract

To assess hepatobiliary (HB) scans for predicting recurrent symptoms in nonoperated patients with mild or vague symptomatic gallstones. Data of 170 patients with symptomatic gallstone and who had not undergone cholecystectomy were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not operations were performed due to recurrent symptoms during the follow-up period. The demographic factors and gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) of HB scans were compared between the groups. Additionally, symptom-free rate was obtained beginning from the date of the HB scan to the date of surgery, and analyzed based on the level of GBEF. Among the 170 enrolled patients, two patients who underwent cholecystectomy for other disease were excluded. Thirty-four patients underwent cholecystectomy due to recurrent symptoms (OP group), and the remaining 136 patients did not experience recurrent symptoms and therefore did not undergo cholecystectomy (non-OP group). In the OP group, the mean GBEF was significantly lower than that of the non-OP group (28.8 ± 29.9 vs. 66.3 ± 20.0; P < 0.001). The rate of lower GBEF (<30 %, including non-visualization of the gallbladder) was significantly higher in the OP group than the non-OP group (54.9 vs. 5.1 %; P < 0.001). In patients with non-visualization of the gallbladder or GBEF <30 %, the 10-year symptom-free rate was significantly lower than those with a GBEF ≥ 30 % (19.8 % vs. 81.9 %; P < 0.001). HB scanning is a useful objective modality to differentiate gallstone-related symptoms from other etiologies and predict recurrent symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,775,656
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#1,035
of 1,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,046
of 279,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.