↓ Skip to main content

Fluid management guided by a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity after total knee and hip replacement

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluid management guided by a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity after total knee and hip replacement
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12871-015-0131-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Benes, Lenka Haidingerova, Jiri Pouska, Jan Stepanik, Alena Stenglova, Jan Zatloukal, Richard Pradl, Ivan Chytra, Eduard Kasal

Abstract

The use of goal directed fluid protocols in intermediate risk patients undergoing hip or knee replacement was studied in few trials using invasive monitoring. For this reason we have implemented two different fluid management protocols, both based on a novel totally non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring device and compared them to the standard (no-protocol) treatment applied before the transition in our academic institution. Three treatment groups were compared in this prospective study: the observational (CONTROL, N = 40) group before adoption of fluid protocols and two randomized groups after the transition to protocol fluid management with the use of the continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (CNAP®) device. In the PRESSURE group (N = 40) standard variables were used for restrictive fluid therapy. Goal directed fluid therapy using pulse pressure variation was used in the GDFT arm (N = 40). The influence on the rate of postoperative complications, on the hospital length of stay and other parameters was assessed. Both protocols were associated with decreased fluid administration and maintained hemodynamic stability. Reduced rate of postoperative infection and organ complications (22 (55 %) vs. 33 (83 %) patients; p = 0.016; relative risk 0.67 (0.49-0.91)) was observed in the GDFT group compared to CONTROL. Lower number of patients receiving transfusion (4 (10 %) in GDFT vs. 17 (43 %) in CONTROL; p = 0.005) might contribute to this observation. No significant differences were observed in other end-points. In our study, the use of the fluid protocol based on pulse pressure variation assessed using continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement seems to be associated with a reduction in postoperative complications and transfusion needs as compared to standard no-protocol treatment. ACTRN12612001014842.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 16%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 26 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Engineering 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 25 27%