You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
T2 quantification for improved detection of myocardial edema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-11-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shivraman Giri, Yiu-Cho Chung, Ali Merchant, Georgeta Mihai, Sanjay Rajagopalan, Subha V Raman, Orlando P Simonetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 362 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 23% |
| Researcher | 77 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 75 | 20% |
| Unknown | 52 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 181 | 48% |
| Engineering | 66 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 21 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Unknown | 69 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#17,537,548
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,091
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,709
of 174,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.