You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Controversies and challenges of vaccination: an interview with Elizabeth Miller
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-015-0508-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth Miller |
Abstract |
Although strong evidence exists that the benefits of vaccination by far outweigh potential adverse events, controversy still exists. This has led opponents of vaccination to question its safety, efficacy and necessity. In an interview with Professor Elizabeth Miller, we discuss the continuum of beliefs held by vaccine refusers and hesitators, the resulting health consequences, and ways in which health professionals and industry regulators can help promote transparency to better convey the substantial health benefits of vaccination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 16% |
Canada | 2 | 11% |
United States | 2 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
Scientists | 4 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 26% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
Other | 19 | 25% |
Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,332,325
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#930
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,655
of 285,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#32
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.