↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Ethnoveterinary treatments by dromedary camel herders in the Suleiman Mountainous Region in Pakistan: an observation and questionnaire study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethnoveterinary treatments by dromedary camel herders in the Suleiman Mountainous Region in Pakistan: an observation and questionnaire study
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-6-16
Pubmed ID
20565919
Authors

Abdul Raziq, Kerstin de Verdier, Muhammad Younas

Abstract

The Suleiman mountainous region is an important cradle of animal domestication and the habitat of many indigenous livestock breeds. The dromedary camel is a highly appreciated and valued animal and represents an important genetic resource. Camel herders, living in remote areas, have developed their own ways to treat diseases in camels, based on a long time of experience.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
India 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 2 4%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 29%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 15 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,410,276
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#318
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,442
of 93,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.

This page is provided by Altmetric.