↓ Skip to main content

Consolidation chemotherapy may improve survival for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy - retrospective analysis of 203 cases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consolidation chemotherapy may improve survival for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy - retrospective analysis of 203 cases
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1710-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lipin Liu, Nan Bi, Zhe Ji, Junling Li, Jingbo Wang, Xiaozhen Wang, Zhouguang Hui, Jima Lv, Jun Liang, Zongmei Zhou, Yan Wang, Weibo Yin, Luhua Wang

Abstract

For patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), the role of consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is partially defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CCT. The characteristics of LA-NSCLC patients treated with curative concurrent CRT from 2001 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Among 203 patients, 113 (55.7 %) patients received CCT. The median number of delivered CCT was 3 and 89.4 % patients completed ≥2 cycles. The OS was significantly better for patients in the CCT group compared with that in the non-CCT group (median OS, 27 months vs. 16 months; 5-year OS, 30.4 % vs. 22.5 %; p = 0.012). The median PFS were 12 months in the CCT group and 9 months in the non-CCT group (p = 0.291). The survival advantages of CCT were significant for males (HR: 0.63; 95 % CI, 0.44 - 0.90), patients with age < 60 years (HR: 0.63; 95 % CI, 0.42 - 0.95), non-squamous histology (HR: 0.44; 95 % CI, 0.25 - 0.76), pretreatment KPS ≥ 80 (HR: 0.67; 95 % CI, 0.48 - 0.93), stage IIIb (HR: 0.64; 95 % CI, 0.43 - 0.95), stable disease (HR: 0.31; 95 % CI, 0.14 - 0.65) and radiotherapy dose ≥ 60 Gy (HR: 0.69; 95 % CI, 0.48 - 1.00). There was no significant difference between the CCT group and the non-CCT group regarding treatment-related toxicities. CCT might further prolong survival compared with CRT alone for LA-NSCLC without increasing treatment-related toxicities, especially for males, patients with age < 60 years, non-squamous histology, pretreatment KPS ≥ 80, stage IIIb, stable disease and radiotherapy dose ≥ 60 Gy. Large size prospective investigations that incorporate patient characteristics and treatment response are warranted to validate our findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,294,248
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,496
of 8,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,870
of 280,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#179
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,305 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.