↓ Skip to main content

WALANT for distal radius fracture: open reduction with plating fixation via wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
WALANT for distal radius fracture: open reduction with plating fixation via wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13018-018-0903-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying-Cheng Huang, Chien-Jen Hsu, Jenn-Huei Renn, Kai-Cheng Lin, Shan-Wei Yang, Yih-Wen Tarng, Wei-Ning Chang, Chun-Yu Chen

Abstract

The wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique is applied during various hand surgeries. We investigated the perioperative variables and clinical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fractures under WALANT. From January 2015 to January 2017, 60 patients with distal radius fractures were treated, and 24 patients (40% of all) were treated with either a volar or a dorsal plate via WALANT procedure. Of these 24 patients, 21 radius fractures were fixed with a volar plate, and the other 3 were fixed with a dorsal plate. Radiographs; range of motions; visual analog scale (VAS); quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Quick DASH) questionnaire; and time to union were evaluated. One of the 24 patients could not tolerate the WALANT procedure and was reported as a failed attempt at WALANT. In the cohort, 23 patients successfully received distal radius ORIF under WALANT procedure. The average age is 60.9 (range, 20-88) years. The average operation time was 64.3 (range, 45-85) minutes, the average blood loss was 18.9 (range, 5-30) ml, and the average of duration of hospitalization is 1.8 (range, 1-6) days. The average postoperative day one VAS was 1.6 (range, 1-3). The average time of union was 20.7 (range, 15-32) weeks. The mean follow-up period was 15.1 (range, 12-24) months. Functional 1-year postoperative outcomes revealed an average Quick DASH score of 7.60 (range, 4.5-13.6) and an average wrist flexion and extension of 69.6° (range, 55-80°) and 57.4° (range, 45-70°). There was no wound infection, neurovascular injury, or other major complication noted. WALANT for distal radius fracture ORIF is a method to control blood loss by the effects of local anesthesia mixed with hemostatic agents. Without a tourniquet, the procedure prevents discomfort caused by tourniquet pain. Without sedation, patients could perform the active range of motion of the injured wrist to check if there is impingement of implants. It eliminates the need of numerous preoperative examinations, postoperative anesthesia recovery room care, and side effects of the sedation. However, patients who are not amenable to the awake procedure are contraindications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 126 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 52 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 61 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,422,940
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#513
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,139
of 330,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.