You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ChromTime: modeling spatio-temporal dynamics of chromatin marks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-018-1485-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petko Fiziev, Jason Ernst |
| Abstract |
To model spatial changes of chromatin mark peaks over time we develop and apply ChromTime, a computational method that predicts peaks to be either expanding, contracting, or holding steady between time points. Predicted expanding and contracting peaks can mark regulatory regions associated with transcription factor binding and gene expression changes. Spatial dynamics of peaks provide information about gene expression changes beyond localized signal density changes. ChromTime detects asymmetric expansions and contractions, which for some marks associate with the direction of transcription. ChromTime facilitates the analysis of time course chromatin data in a range of biological systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 16% |
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 29 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 19 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 27% |
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,485,699
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,176
of 4,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,266
of 342,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#28
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.