↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative ventilation: incidence and risk factors for receiving large tidal volumes during general anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraoperative ventilation: incidence and risk factors for receiving large tidal volumes during general anesthesia
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2253-11-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Fernandez-Bustamante, Cristina L Wood, Zung V Tran, Pierre Moine

Abstract

There is a growing concern of the potential injurious role of ventilatory over-distention in patients without lung injury. No formal guidelines exist for intraoperative ventilation settings, but the use of tidal volumes (VT) under 10 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) has been recommended in healthy patients. We explored the incidence and risk factors for receiving large tidal volumes (VT > 10 mL/kg PBW).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Other 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 58%
Engineering 5 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,797,453
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#76
of 1,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,342
of 239,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them