You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The e-health implementation toolkit: qualitative evaluation across four European countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-122 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne MacFarlane, Pauline Clerkin, Elizabeth Murray, David J Heaney, Mary Wakeling, Ulla-Maija Pesola, Eva Lindh Waterworth, Frank Larsen, Minna Makiniemi, Ilkka Winblad |
| Abstract |
Implementation researchers have attempted to overcome the research-practice gap in e-health by developing tools that summarize and synthesize research evidence of factors that impede or facilitate implementation of innovation in healthcare settings. The e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT) is an example of such a tool that was designed within the context of the United Kingdom National Health Service to promote implementation of e-health services. Its utility in international settings is unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 10% |
| Psychology | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,226,389
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#513
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,058
of 238,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.