↓ Skip to main content

Real world evaluation of a novel lateral flow assay (AlphaKit® QuickScreen) for the detection of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real world evaluation of a novel lateral flow assay (AlphaKit® QuickScreen) for the detection of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency
Published in
Respiratory Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12931-018-0826-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timm Greulich, Francisco Rodríguez-Frias, Irene Belmonte, Andreas Klemmer, Claus F. Vogelmeier, Marc Miravitlles

Abstract

Alpha-1-Antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency (AATD) is a hereditary disorder that manifests primarily as pulmonary emphysema and liver cirrhosis. The clinically most relevant mutation causing AATD is a single nucleotide polymorphism Glu342Lys (Z-mutation). Despite the recommendation to test every COPD patient, the condition remains severely underdiagnosed with a delay of several years between first symptoms and diagnosis. The Grifols' AlphaKit® QuickScreen is a novel qualitative point-of-care (POC) in vitro screening test developed for the detection of the Z AAT protein in capillary whole blood. The objective of this prospective, international, multi-center, diagnostic, interventional real-world study was to assess the performance of this device for the detection of AATD in test-naïve COPD patients. 1044 test-naïve COPD patients were recruited from 9 centers in Spain and 10 centers in Germany, ranging from primary to tertiary care. To evaluate the performance of the test, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated compared with the gold standard (genotyping). Genotyping and phenotyping of all 1019 evaluable samples revealed 4.12% of patients as carriers of at least one Z-allele, while 0.29% carried the homozygous genotype Pi*ZZ. The evaluation of the test's ability to detect the PiZ protein yielded the following results: specificity 97.8%, sensitivity 73.8%, negative predictive value 98.9%, and positive predictive value 58.5%. All false negatives (n = 11) were heterozygote Pi*MZ samples. The tested device can be used as an appropriate tool to exclude AATD in primary care and in the overall COPD population, except in patients with a high a-priori- probability of AATD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,510
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,656
of 341,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#52
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.