↓ Skip to main content

The use of Apixaban for the treatment of an LV thrombus

Overview of attention for article published in Echo Research & Practice, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of Apixaban for the treatment of an LV thrombus
Published in
Echo Research & Practice, December 2018
DOI 10.1530/erp-18-0036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sadie Bennett, Duwarakan Satchithananda

Abstract

A 42 year old male was admitted with shortness of breath secondary to suspected heart failure and chest infection. An echocardiogram revealed a dilated and impaired left ventricle; ejection fraction 29%, with a large, mobile thrombus within the left ventricular apex. Due to the presence of liver dysfunction, vitamin K antagonists were deemed inappropriate, thus the decision was taken to use the novel anticoagulation agent Apixaban. After six days of receiving Apixaban, a cardiac magnetic resonance scan was preformed which showed complete resolution of the LV apical thrombus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 24%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 21%
Computer Science 3 10%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,517,684
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#154
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,596
of 437,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.