↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: A randomised dose-ranging study of tiotropium Respimat® in children with symptomatic asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: A randomised dose-ranging study of tiotropium Respimat® in children with symptomatic asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids
Published in
Respiratory Research, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12931-015-0290-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Vogelberg, Petra Moroni-Zentgraf, Migle Leonaviciute-Klimantaviciene, Ralf Sigmund, Eckard Hamelmann, Michael Engel, Stanley Szefler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 24%
Unspecified 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 55%
Unspecified 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,601
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,280
of 294,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#28
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.