↓ Skip to main content

High adherence to malaria treatment: promising results of an adherence study in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High adherence to malaria treatment: promising results of an adherence study in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Published in
Malaria Journal, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0933-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sibylle Gerstl, Alexis Namagana, Liliana Palacios, Franklin Mweshi, Stella Aprile, Angeles Lima

Abstract

In resource-poor settings, treatment adherence is a major determinant of response to anti-malarial drugs as most are taken at home without medical supervision. Evidence on adherence to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is limited. The study aimed to measure adherence and identify reasons for non-adherence to a 3-day, fixed-dose combination (FDC) of artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in the Médecins Sans Frontières project in the Shabunda Health Zone, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, a highly malarious and conflict-affected area. The study took place in the health centres/outpatient departments of the Shabunda general hospital, the quarter Mbangayo, and participant households. Patients prescribed FDC ASAQ were visited at home on the day after their regimen finished and asked to complete an adherence questionnaire. Patients/caretakers were also interviewed when exiting the outpatient department to understand their attitude towards FDC ASAQ and assess the quality of the prescribing process. 148 patients/caretakers completed the adherence questionnaire: 11.5 % (17/148, 95 % CI 7-17) had ≥1 tablet left at the time of the home visit and were defined as certainly non-adherent; 13.5 % (20/148, 95 % CI 8-19) were probably non-adherent; thus total non-adherence was 25.0 % (37/148, 95 % CI 18-32). 75 % (111/148, 95 % CI 68-82) were defined as probably adherent. In exit interviews, 87.5 % (105/120) knew they had malaria or could name the correct signs/symptoms. 89 % (107/120) could identify FDC ASAQ as anti-malarials among all tablets given and correctly repeat the intake instructions given at the outpatient department. This is the first study to assess adherence to an FDC of ACT under real treatment conditions in a context of high instability. High quality prescribing of anti-malarials at health centre level and patient adherence to the correct intake of ACT were possible in this setting. Adherence to treatment regimen requires careful and constant monitoring which might be better guaranteed at health centre rather than community level. It could, nevertheless, be a precondition to the successful introduction of home- or community based management of malaria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 25 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,293,151
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,527
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,886
of 288,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#79
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.