↓ Skip to main content

“Why not bathe the baby today?”: A qualitative study of thermal care beliefs and practices in four African sites

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Why not bathe the baby today?”: A qualitative study of thermal care beliefs and practices in four African sites
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12887-015-0470-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ebunoluwa Aderonke Adejuyigbe, Margaret Helen Bee, Yared Amare, Babatunji Abayomi Omotara, Ruth Buus Iganus, Fatuma Manzi, Donat Dominic Shamba, Jolene Skordis-Worrall, Adetanwa Odebiyi, Zelee Elizabeth Hill

Abstract

Recommendations for care in the first week of a newborn's life include thermal care practices such as drying and wrapping, skin to skin contact, immediate breastfeeding and delayed bathing. This paper examines beliefs and practices related to neonatal thermal care in three African countries. Data were collected in the same way in each site and included 16-20 narrative interviews with recent mothers, eight observations of neonatal bathing, and in-depth interviews with 12-16 mothers, 9-12 grandmothers, eight health workers and 0-12 birth attendants in each site. We found similarities across sites in relation to understanding the importance of warmth, a lack of opportunities for skin to skin care, beliefs about the importance of several baths per day and beliefs that the Vernix caseosa was related to poor maternal behaviours. There was variation between sites in beliefs and practices around wrapping and drying after delivery, and the timing of the first bath with recent behavior change in some sites. There was near universal early bathing of babies in both Nigerian sites. This was linked to a deep-rooted belief about body odour. When asked about keeping the baby warm, respondents across the sites rarely mentioned recommended thermal care practices, suggesting that these are not perceived as salient. More effort is needed to promote appropriate thermal care practices both in facilities and at home. Programmers should be aware that changing deep rooted practices, such as early bathing in Nigeria, may take time and should utilize the current beliefs in the importance of neonatal warmth to facilitate behaviour change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Lecturer 9 6%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 46 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 21%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 56 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#13,556,443
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,673
of 3,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,327
of 280,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#36
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.