You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
eXframe: reusable framework for storage, analysis and visualization of genomics experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-12-452 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amit U Sinha, Emily Merrill, Scott A Armstrong, Tim W Clark, Sudeshna Das |
| Abstract |
Genome-wide experiments are routinely conducted to measure gene expression, DNA-protein interactions and epigenetic status. Structured metadata for these experiments is imperative for a complete understanding of experimental conditions, to enable consistent data processing and to allow retrieval, comparison, and integration of experimental results. Even though several repositories have been developed for genomics data, only a few provide annotation of samples and assays using controlled vocabularies. Moreover, many of them are tailored for a single type of technology or measurement and do not support the integration of multiple data types. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 50 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 33% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,845,290
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,168
of 7,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,347
of 239,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#43
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.