↓ Skip to main content

A retrospective, longitudinal study of factors associated with new antipsychotic medication use among recently admitted long-term care residents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A retrospective, longitudinal study of factors associated with new antipsychotic medication use among recently admitted long-term care residents
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12877-015-0127-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Foebel, Anna Ballokova, Nathalie IH Wellens, Daniela Fialova, Koen Milisen, Rosa Liperoti, John P Hirdes

Abstract

Use of antipsychotic (AP) medications is high and often inappropriate among institutionalized populations. Little is known about the correlates of new AP drug use following admission to long-term care (LTC) settings. This study investigated the frequency and correlates of new AP drug use among newly admitted LTC residents. This longitudinal, retrospective study used data from the interRAI - Nursing Home Minimum Data Set version 2.0 (MDS 2.0) instrument. Data about demographic, clinical and social characteristics, and medication use, were collected in Ontario, Canada, from 2003-2011 by trained nurses. Residents with complete admission and 3-6 month follow-up data were included (N = 47,768). Multivariate logistic regression analyses, stratified by gender, explored correlates of new AP drug use upon admission to LTC. New AP drug users comprised 7 % of the final cohort. Severe cognitive impairment, dementia, and motor agitation were significantly associated with new AP drug use among both sexes. Additionally, behavioural problems, conflicts with staff and reduced social engagement were strong correlates of new AP drug use. Social factors were as strongly associated with new AP drug use after LTC admission as clinical factors. Strategies to prevent the potential misuse of AP drugs upon LTC admission should consider the social determinants of such prescribing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Librarian 6 6%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 21%
Psychology 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,099,249
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,917
of 3,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,746
of 283,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.